Mp3 player: Apple or Philips?

I would like to get a cheap mp3 player and can't decide which one of those to buy. Could you help me? Or maybe you have some other suggestions?





1. Apple mp3 shuffle. Without a screen. I mean the older version, which has not a square, but rather oblong shape. No folder browsing function, but I guess it has better sound quality than the Philips player. Rechargeable battery.


http://www.alternativemp3players.co.uk/m...





2. Philips Go Gear SA1100. With a screen. Has a folder browsing function. AAA type baterry.


http://www.cnet.com.au/mp3players/mp3pla...

Mp3 player: Apple or Philips?
If these are the only tweo you can get, always go for the iPod, if only for the rechargeable battery. Buying new batteries constantly is a bit of a pain. Plus it definately has better sound quality.





To be honest though, I'd say everyone here is right - I would save your money and wait a little longer to get a Nano. You could even save more to get a Video - best contraption ever made in my view :D
Reply:i think you must try this Sony NW-E013F/B.
Reply:To be honest I would get an I Pod nano I have one they are excellent and the memory is huge. I have seen the shuffles and Im not impressed I like to choose which song's I listen to, that would drive me crazy a constant shuffle :)
Reply:BANANA
Reply:Save your money and get an iPod nano. They are the best.
Reply:You should rather save money and get an Ipod Nano .They're the best .